POS Comparisons

Uber Eats vs Owner.com: Which POS Is Better? (2025)

By Mauricio Nov 23, 2025 3 min read

In the battle of Uber Eats versus Owner.com, both systems bring unique strengths to the table. Uber Eats is particularly strong for Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach, while Owner.com excels at Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. Whether you prioritize Large delivery network or Commission-free ordering, this comparison covers everything you need to know.

Quick Comparison: Uber Eats vs Owner.com

FeatureUber EatsOwner.com
CategorySoftwareSoftware
Starting Price15-30% commission per order$249/month
Rating3.8/54.5/5
Target BusinessSmall Business to EnterpriseSmall Business to Mid-Market
Pricing ModelCommission-basedSubscription
Free TrialNoNo
Free VersionNoNo
Best ForRestaurants wanting broad delivery reachRestaurants wanting direct customer relationships

Uber Eats Overview

Uber Eats for Merchants provides delivery marketplace access and direct ordering solutions for restaurants. Includes tablet for order management, delivery logistics, and marketing tools.

Uber Eats is offered by Uber Technologies (founded 2014) based in San Francisco, CA. The system focuses on Restaurants.

Looking for a POS system? Get free quotes from top vendors

Key Features:

  • Delivery Platform
  • Order Management
  • Analytics
  • Marketing Tools
  • Pickup Option
  • Driver Network

Owner.com Overview

Owner.com is a restaurant website and ordering platform that helps restaurants build direct customer relationships. Features custom websites, online ordering, and marketing automation.

Owner.com is offered by Owner.com (founded 2019) based in Palo Alto, CA. The system focuses on Restaurants.

Key Features:

  • Custom Website
  • Online Ordering
  • Marketing Automation
  • Guest Database
  • SEO Tools
  • Analytics

Feature Comparison

Uber Eats Features:

  • Delivery Platform
  • Order Management
  • Analytics
  • Marketing Tools
  • Pickup Option

Owner.com Features:

  • Custom Website
  • Online Ordering
  • Marketing Automation
  • Guest Database
  • SEO Tools

When comparing features, Uber Eats stands out with Large delivery network, while Owner.com differentiates itself with Commission-free ordering. Your choice should depend on which features align better with your specific business requirements.

Pricing Comparison

Pricing AspectUber EatsOwner.com
Starting Price15-30% commission per order$249/month
Pricing ModelCommission-basedSubscription
Price RangeMid-range to PremiumMid-range
Free TrialNot availableNot available
Free VersionNoNo

Both systems offer competitive pricing for their respective feature sets. Consider the total cost of ownership including hardware, processing fees, and add-on modules when making your decision.

Pros and Cons

Uber Eats

Pros:

  • Massive customer reach
  • Reliable delivery network
  • Marketing tools
  • Brand awareness

Cons:

  • High commission fees
  • Less control over customer experience
  • Competitive marketplace

Owner.com

Pros:

  • No commission ordering
  • Strong marketing tools
  • Customer data ownership
  • Professional websites

Cons:

  • Higher monthly cost
  • Not a POS system
  • Requires separate POS

Who Should Choose Uber Eats?

Uber Eats is ideal for Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach. The system is particularly well-suited for Restaurants.

However, Uber Eats may not be the best fit for Those avoiding high commission fees.

Who Should Choose Owner.com?

Owner.com is ideal for Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. The system is particularly well-suited for Restaurants.

However, Owner.com may not be the best fit for Those needing full POS functionality.

Our Recommendation

Both Uber Eats and Owner.com are solid POS solutions, but they excel in different areas. Choose Uber Eats if you’re Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach. Choose Owner.com if you’re Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. Owner.com has a higher user rating (4.5 vs 3.8). We recommend trying demos or free trials of both systems before making your final decision.