POS Comparisons

Uber Eats vs BentoBox: Which POS Is Better? (2025)

By Mauricio Sep 29, 2025 3 min read

In the battle of Uber Eats versus BentoBox, both systems bring unique strengths to the table. Uber Eats is particularly strong for Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach, while BentoBox excels at Restaurants needing professional web presence. Whether you prioritize Large delivery network or Restaurant-focused websites, this comparison covers everything you need to know.

Quick Comparison: Uber Eats vs BentoBox

FeatureUber EatsBentoBox
CategorySoftwareSoftware
Starting Price15-30% commission per order$99/month
Rating3.8/54.4/5
Target BusinessSmall Business to EnterpriseSmall Business to Mid-Market
Pricing ModelCommission-basedSubscription
Free TrialNoNo
Free VersionNoNo
Best ForRestaurants wanting broad delivery reachRestaurants needing professional web presence

Uber Eats Overview

Uber Eats for Merchants provides delivery marketplace access and direct ordering solutions for restaurants. Includes tablet for order management, delivery logistics, and marketing tools.

Uber Eats is offered by Uber Technologies (founded 2014) based in San Francisco, CA. The system focuses on Restaurants.

Looking for a POS system? Get free quotes from top vendors

Key Features:

  • Delivery Platform
  • Order Management
  • Analytics
  • Marketing Tools
  • Pickup Option
  • Driver Network

BentoBox Overview

BentoBox is a restaurant website and marketing platform acquired by Fiserv. Offers website design, online ordering, email marketing, and gift card solutions specifically for restaurants.

BentoBox is offered by BentoBox (Fiserv) (founded 2013) based in New York, NY. The system focuses on Restaurants, Hospitality.

Key Features:

  • Website Builder
  • Online Ordering
  • Email Marketing
  • Gift Cards
  • SEO Tools
  • Analytics

Feature Comparison

Uber Eats Features:

  • Delivery Platform
  • Order Management
  • Analytics
  • Marketing Tools
  • Pickup Option

BentoBox Features:

  • Website Builder
  • Online Ordering
  • Email Marketing
  • Gift Cards
  • SEO Tools

When comparing features, Uber Eats stands out with Large delivery network, while BentoBox differentiates itself with Restaurant-focused websites. Your choice should depend on which features align better with your specific business requirements.

Pricing Comparison

Pricing AspectUber EatsBentoBox
Starting Price15-30% commission per order$99/month
Pricing ModelCommission-basedSubscription
Price RangeMid-range to PremiumMid-range
Free TrialNot availableNot available
Free VersionNoNo

Both systems offer competitive pricing for their respective feature sets. Consider the total cost of ownership including hardware, processing fees, and add-on modules when making your decision.

Pros and Cons

Uber Eats

Pros:

  • Massive customer reach
  • Reliable delivery network
  • Marketing tools
  • Brand awareness

Cons:

  • High commission fees
  • Less control over customer experience
  • Competitive marketplace

BentoBox

Pros:

  • Restaurant-focused design
  • Beautiful templates
  • Fiserv backing
  • Marketing tools included

Cons:

  • Not a full POS system
  • Additional cost for add-ons
  • Requires separate POS

Who Should Choose Uber Eats?

Uber Eats is ideal for Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach. The system is particularly well-suited for Restaurants.

However, Uber Eats may not be the best fit for Those avoiding high commission fees.

Who Should Choose BentoBox?

BentoBox is ideal for Restaurants needing professional web presence. The system is particularly well-suited for Restaurants, Hospitality.

However, BentoBox may not be the best fit for Those needing full POS functionality.

Our Recommendation

Both Uber Eats and BentoBox are solid POS solutions, but they excel in different areas. Choose Uber Eats if you’re Restaurants wanting broad delivery reach. Choose BentoBox if you’re Restaurants needing professional web presence. BentoBox has a higher user rating (4.4 vs 3.8). We recommend trying demos or free trials of both systems before making your final decision.